“
By Benjamin D. Bailey
It does not take a genius
to recognize that a man will usually adapt to and become a part of the
socio-enviromental atmosphere that surrounds his everyday life. For example: If a firm, ripe apple is picked
from a tree and placed in a basket of rotten apples, the good apple will become
bad in a minute period of time. This
same theory applied to the Corinthians in the 1st century. Due to a debauch society, the Corinthians had
at one time been a part of ungodliness and corrupt worldliness. But Paul, hoping to spare their spirit from
spiritual rottenness, presented them with the sin-blasting dynamite of God’s
word (Rom 1:16; Acts 20:32) so that they might be able to spend the rest of
their days upon this vale of soul making bearing fruit to God (Rom 7:4).
The
city of
Since
The city of
As was previously noted,
In the rest of this
paper, the design of intent will be to recognize the problems that the city of
The
city of
This
kind of philosophical exaltation of professors of philosophy may have been a
direct outgrowth of Christians exalting preachers instead of the Christ. In I Corinthians 1:12-13 Paul deals with this
problem by saying, “Now I say this, that
each of you says, "I am of Paul," or "I am of Apollos," or
"I am of Cephas," or "I am of Christ."
Is
Christ divided? Was Paul crucified for
you? Or were you baptized in the name of
Paul?” It may have been the
case that certain Christians were exalting their favorite preacher for his
ability and talents they liked. For
example, someone might exalt the Apostle Paul for his great logic and keen
background into Judaism. Or, another
might exalt Apollos for his eloquent speaking ability (Acts 18:24). Yet another Christian may have been following
Peter because of his privilege of opening the kingdom with the first gospel
sermon (Acts 2). Whatever the case may
have been, the Corinthians had a serious problem with sectarianism and
division.
Sadly,
much of the religious world today is divided over the same mundane exaltation
of men instead of Jesus Christ. For
instance, if you were to ask someone off the street what religious affiliation
they belonged to they might say, “I am a Lutheran.”, or “I am a Methodist.”, or
“I am a Calvinist.” The church of the
Lord has the same problem today as our brethren in
First,
by implication in I Cor 1:13, we learn the qualifications a person must meet to
have followers “of” him: (1) To have
followers a person must have been crucified as a sinless sacrifice for mankind
(Lev 4:1ff; 2 Cor 5:21; I Pet 1:19, 2:24).
(2) His followers must be baptized into his name.
Since
it is the case that all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God (Rom
3:23), then no one except Christ can have people “of” Him. Therefore, it is no wonder that the 1st
century brethren chose to be called Christians first (Acts 11:26).
Secondly,
to cure sectarianism Paul tells us in I Corinthians 1:18-26 that we should not
dabble in human wisdom, but let the wisdom of God be our pattern for spiritual
matters (2 Tim 1:13, 3:16-17). Let us
all from this point onward not put our trust in man’s wisdom, but in the
verbally, inerant, inspired word of God (Jer. 1:9; John 8:32, 17:17; 2 Pet
1:20-21).
Not Sensuality, But Spirituality
Most
people who have been converted from the world to the church will agree that it
is hard not to desire to go back to the world with its self-gratifying
pleasures. The Corinthians were a case
example of how challenging it can be to be “in” the world, but not “of” the
world.
The
city of
However,
many Christians today are in the same position and condemnation as the
Corinthian Christians in the 1st century were. One of the number one problems with
Christians today is excelled worldliness.
Instead of trying to come out from among them and be separate (2 Cor
6:17-18), some Christians today are trying to have one foot in the world, and
one foot in the kingdom of Christ. Too
many Christians want to be “of the world, and “in” the world at the same time.
The cure for carnality then and now is
twofold. First, we must “grow in the
grace and knowledge of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ” (2 Pet 3:18). Instead
of desiring to be part of the world, we must “desire the pure milk of the word
that we may grow thereby” (I Pet 2:2).
Sadly, we have way too many grown babies in the
Secondly,
to avoid sensuality, one must recognize the penalty for being carnally
minded. In Romans 8:6-7 Paul says this
concerning the wages of carnality, “For
to be carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and
peace. Because the carnal mind is enmity
against God; for it is not subject to the law of God, nor indeed can be.” Christians must recognize that trying to
be a friend with the world make us God’s enemy (James 4:4). And, therefore, let us always remain
unstained from the world and all its sensual desires of the flesh. “For
our God is a consuming fire,” and “It
is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God” (Heb 12:29,
10:31).
Not Fornication, But Fidelity
Of
“
With the overflow of testosterone
filled sailors,
But how did this affect
the church in
Many congregations of
God’s people today feel the same way towards sin in the camp. Because we live in a society that accepts
fornication, divorce, adultery, and most unscriptural sexual activity, we
sometimes think that God changes with the society. However, that is foreign to Bible theology
(Malachi 3:6).
The solution for the
problems now and the problem then is simple; abstain from sexual sins and discipline
those who will not. In I Corinthians
5:5,11 Paul tells the Lord’s people that immorality can not be tolerated in the
Lord’s church, and therefore, the guilty brethren must be disfellowshiped from
in hopes that it will eventually save their soul. Today, there are way too many congregations
of God’s people who are putting up with Christians in unscriptural
relationships, instead of putting them out of fellowship. Instead of tolerating immorality in the
church, we must terminate its very existence.
It is evident from the
historical and biblical evidence that the Corinthian
1
Merril
F. Unger, Unger’s
Bible Dictionary, (Chicago, Ill., Moody Press, 1957), p.220
2 Jim McGuiggin, A
Commentary on I Corinthians, (Lubbock, Tx, Montex Publishing Co.,1984), p.9
3
David Lipscomb, A Commentary on I
Corinthians,
(Nashville, Tn, Gospel Advocate Company, 1955), p. xi
4 McGuiggin, p. 6